I realized it was more likely that I combined the concept "seeing her naked" with a memory of her general proportions and general images of what a woman's body looks like. As far as details go, I could think I remember her pubic hair (which I only saw that once) but "black triangle" is easy enough
to refine into a realistic pseudo-memory.
I might well remember that scene more vividly than many others because of its emotional charge. But is the image truly detailed or are semi-linguistic symbols like "Leslie naked" just stored in a bolder font than others?
Now I'm picturing a word cloud. I'm also picturing a sort of set theory Venn diagram. People (and other images) that occupy the intersection of two sets are bolder, as it were. To continue the theme I've started (clearly a bold face theme in my mind) I've known a number of people personally and seen a number of people naked. The people who belong to both sets will be represented more boldly.
And the funny thing is, now you have some simple mental image of Leslie, who you have never met, presumably. This is based on your idea of what women look like and perhaps other Leslies you have known.
I just started a novel and there was this:
"That face will be built by what isn’t seen, built from an amalgam of other faces, faces of people we know and people we’ve seen on television and movies and within crowds. Perhaps we’ll imagine a kind face when it is more likely he has a face, to our enduring shame, that does not inspire our kindness."
—Paul Tremblay, Horror Movie: A Novel

No comments:
Post a Comment